Top 5 Baseball Board Game Under The Radar Player Cards

Top 5 Baseball Board Game Under The Radar Player Cards

Here’s possibly the 5 best MLB players you may have never heard of and that almost always have the most fascinating cards no matter which tabletop baseball board games you enjoy playing.

under the radarI would bat them in the #2 spot in any baseball lineup every time.  Some are in the Hall of Fame and 3 of them are named Ed.  How many famous MLB players named Ed can you think of?!  I would play them against the greatest pitchers of all-time, any time.

Their Baseball Classics cards always provide a rainbow of bright colors from top to bottom.  Roll after dice roll they always give you a chance to get on base and keep the line moving and sometimes provide a bit of pop in their bat.

These are my all-time favorite Major League Baseball players who most fans have probably never heard of.  If you get a chance to play them, you will see that these MLB players have some of the coolest tabletop baseball board game cards no matter your favorite one you enjoy playing.  Here is my top 5 in this category, starting with number 5.

#5 Eddie Joost – Shortstop, Secondbase, and Thirdbase  (1936 – 1955) Reds/Braves/Athletics/Red Sox

1949 Joost

A poster boy as an underrated baseball player, my 5th ranked MLBer in this category is well deserving.  This MLB lifetime .239 hitter was a 2-time all-star and received MVP votes 5 seasons.  How many lifetime .239 hitters can stake that claim?

Joost was smooth in the field, an integral part of a double-play machine during several seasons with the A’s.  He also had some might in his bat, and though wasn’t a contact hitter he made up for up with his patience at the plate.  His Baseball Classics cards are splattered with ink colors up and down.  You will forget all about his lightweight average because he can just about do it all for your team including drive in a good amount of runs too.

Here’s a card from one of his best seasons, 1949, this Eddie Joost card is loaded.

#4  Ed Roush – Outfield (1945-1955) Reds

All-Time RoushMy personal nickname for this great hitting and fielding Hall of Famer is the “Triple Kid”.  He could hit, but where he gets me is I’m a sucker for a ball player who has the knack for hitting more than his fair share of triples.  Ed’s cards always have a healthy three-bagger rating in Baseball Classics, yet that will hold consistent for any baseball board games featuring this all-time great season after season.  Nearly 8% of Ed’s hits throughout his career resulted in a triple.  That’s astounding!  Let’s put it into perspective for a moment.  Wouldn’t it be fair to say that Ricky Henderson would be someone a baseball fan would think would have a fairly high number of triples?  Yet the same percentage for Ricky over his career was just over 2%.

Where they are similar is with their ability to have some pop in their bat and get on base, i.e. On base Plus Slugging known as OPS.  No one had the stolen base flare in the game as Ricky Henderson, yet when it comes to batting number 2 in the order, I would put Ed Roush there anytime, his cards make for great game play.

Ed Roush  2376 hits, 182 triples, .323 BA, .815 OPS

Ricky Henderson  3055 hits, 66 triples, .279 BA, .820 OPS

#3 Eddie Yost– Thirdbase (1944 – 1962) Senators/Tigers/Angels

1959 YostDon’t be fooled by his .254 lifetime batting average.  Eddie Yost was a solid ball player; he could do all the little things to help your team win.  He’ll reach base plenty with his lifetime .394% on base percentage (OBP) over 18 seasons, move runners along with the bunt, and run around the bases to score often.  Talk about consistency over the long haul, this seemingly modest player reached on base via the free pass every 1.3 games over the course of 2109 career games.  9 of his 18 seasons he had an OBP greater than .400%, mercy!

Which All-Time Senators or Twins player over the course of their career had more walks than Eddie Yost?  Nobody.  Eddie was a good fielder too.  There wasn’t much he couldn’t do including give you a little pop in his bat now and then.  Playing most of his career for the Senators, word has it he would have hit many more home runs if he didn’t play in that spacious park.  Regardless, I would take this most leadoff batter and plunk him in at the second spot in my batting order and enjoy his contributions every game in so many ways.

#2  Max Bishop – Secondbase (1924 – 1935) Athletics/Red Sox

All-Time BishopOne of his nicknames was “Camera eye”.  Max wears out the yellow ink on his Baseball Classics baseball game player cards.  He was a decent average, light hitter, yet was able to reach base consistently thanks to his keen eye.  He compiled 1153 career walks and was a very good contact hitter with only 452 strikeouts.  Because Max reached based so often he scored nearly 1000 times in his career at 966.  He only played in 1138 games, thus an impressive ratio of runs scored to games played, especially for a career .271 batting average.

Max is another leadoff hitter in his career that I would bat second.  Max is the kind of player you want to insert at the number 2 spot in your order to reach base, score once he reaches base, and get the job done with a sacrifice bunt when needed.  He’s a little scoring machine, which is really something when you think about him being an average hitter for the most part.  4 seasons in a row, from 1928 through 1931 he scored more than 100 runs.  8 seasons in a row, from 1926 through 1933 he walked more than 100 times.  He makes my #2 ranking because his cards are colorful in Baseball Classics due to his lifetime, highly impressive .423% OBP!  This is his All-Time card, imagine how spiffy some of his best season Baseball Classics player cards looked like.

#1  Dick Dietz – Catcher and Firstbase (1966-1973) Giants/Dodgers/Braves

1973 DietzHere’s a guy that probably most have either not heard of, or if they have, they forgot about him.  He wasn’t a flashy player by any stretch of the imagination.  Yet he ranks in my top 5 at number 1 because his baseball game player cards are spectacular.  They are loaded with ways to get on base.  Dick had an eye for the walk and yet had decent batting averages that were sandwiched by his lone 1970 all-star season.  This combination made for some incredibly tough cards to get him out.

Let’s take my favorite card of his, the 1973 season with the Atlanta Braves; ironically and remarkably it was his last season in the bigs.  There is no card I know of that is more daunting when it comes to getting on base for a guy you most likely never heard of.  Check out his walk percentage that season per plate appearance, it was a walloping 25.6%.  His Baseball Classics cards require plenty of yellow ink to print out his sky-high amount of walks each season. Dick Dietz will keep the line moving by getting on base like nobody’s business.  He walked the walk, making a career of getting on base sporting an on base percentage of 39%.  Here’s his aforementioned Baseball Classics 1973 Atlanta Braves MLB season card, put your sunglasses on.

Though these 5 fascinating Major League Baseball players could reach base via the walk a jaw dropping number of times, they all had so many other great skills to make their teams far better.  Who are some of your favorite underrated MLB baseball players that have juicy player cards no matter which baseball board games you play and why?

Game That Inspired Baseball Classics

Game That Inspired Baseball Classics

It was a sunny, summer Saturday morning in the early 1970’s and for some reason that day I slept in well past my usual early morning wake up time.  I woke up to the feeling of a package that just arrived, one of my family members gently placed at the foot of my bed.  I laid still and didn’t peek, and continued that way for several minutes after they quietly left.

I knew what it was and to this day still remember that special feeling one gets when something arrives they have been looking forward to.  For a moment if felt like Christmas morning.  When I opened my eyes, there it was, a long rectangular-shaped cardboard box containing the game I ordered and had been anxiously awaiting.

The tabletop baseball board game that was an inspiration of Baseball Classics

After carefully opening up the box, I was not disappointed one bit.  There it was, a game with the throwback feel and yet new design, different from all the heavily text-based others.  Colorful and had the greatest MLB players of all-time, the very best through the early 1970’s.  16 teams, featuring their best franchise players including my all-time favorites Lou Gehrig and Mickey Mantle, though so many more.  As well as other’s I never heard of before and came to appreciate like Rudy York, Eddie Joost, and Three Finger Mordecai Brown to name a few.  It wasn’t long before I came to know them based on their contributions once I started playing game after game rotating through these 16 teams of greatness across the eras.

I played Strat-o-matic, SherCo, APBA, and so many others that were great fun, but this game, now this was special.  This was Sports Illustrated All-Time All-Star Baseball Game, it was released in 1973, I was hooked.  It was the inspiration behind Baseball Classics.  Sadly, there was never to be any revised editions in subsequent years.  The game can be found for purchase from time to time on sites such as eBay, typically ranging from $100 to well over $200 or far more depending on the condition.

When I designed Baseball Classics, this was the game that came to the forefront of my mind.  It had a great combination of one I thought was the most fun to play, easiest to play, fastest to play, minimum charts, had MLB greats across the eras, realistic, and accurate.  This is a combination I embraced and built the Baseball Classics business model around.

Game Design

Sports Illustrated All-Time All-Star Baseball Game Player Sheets

The SI All-Time All-Star baseball game had a new design, full color team sheets compared to the black and white, plain font lettering of other games.  Everything from batting stance, batting vs. a lefty or righty pitcher, bunting, and the result of an at bat and plays such as stealing, base

Matrix Edition Card

running, etc., all color-coded.  Baseball Classics eventually adopted full color-coding, we like to call “traffic highlighting”, for all player card ratings (bunting, base stealing, base running, fielding) results, and the Play Chart.  This enhances not only the look and feel of the game, but also makes it easier and faster to glance through your players to see which ones are strong in the areas you’re looking for as you build and/or insert into your lineup and pitching.

Upon showing a Baseball Classics to a friend one day to get his opinion, he said “In 5 seconds you can tell how to play!”.  Formerly, Baseball Classics carried the Matrix Edition, some may find it resembled the SI game player look and feel most.

Perhaps those familiar with SI may have another point of view, but in mine their game gives that design feeling of throwback and modern baseball.  Providing All-Time All-Time Star players from yester year such as Ty Cobb and up to the early 1970’s with players like Reggie Jackson along with their mostly black and white game box cover gave it such such charisma.  The Baseball Classics name and logo were designed to embrace both the throwback and modern eras MLB; we hope you feel they do.

Play Any Major League Baseball Team

This is another area of the game that truly inspired our offering any Major League Baseball season or team from 1901 to present!  The SI game featured the greatest players of all-time, some spanning into the late 1800’s like Honus Wagner for example.  Naturally, Baseball is such a historic icon with many fans appreciating the glory of yesterday we were surely wanting to provide access to all these great teams and players as well.

From the beginning, Baseball Classics offered not just the All-Time greats, but any MLB seasons and individual teams dating back from 1901.  Our most popular season is always the current season available.  Next would be seasons and teams from the 1960’s and 1970’s.  However it is probably not a surprise that so many other seasons and teams are purchased including 1901.  We have had many requests to offer Negro League, Minor League, and the Federal League of which we have noted.  Yet, with over 100 MLB seasons to supply, we have plenty to focus on and provide for our customers.  I feel it is important to serve the mass of baseball fans and their variety in taste to ensure they can manage all the MLB teams and players they want.

David S. Neft and Richard M. CohenThe best benefit I enjoyed when playing SI’s game was learning about cool new players I never heard of.   Their performance piqued my interest, I wanted to them research them further.  It steered me to books like the Baseball Encyclopedia and The Sports Encyclopedia of Baseball by David Neft and Richard Cohen.  The first one I purchased of the latter was the 1985 edition.  Since the SI game didn’t provide player stats, I was curious to see just what was behind their colorful player ratings.  The 1986,1987, and 1988 editions of Baseball Classics used stats from the aforementioned books.  There are many other baseball books that I have read and flipped through to gain more insight into these older ball players well before my time.  One I keep handy is Rob Neyer’s Big Book of Baseball Lineups.  It’s one of my personal favorites to learn about so many players across the MLB eras, an easy, insightful, and enjoyable read.

Game Play

SI is easy and fast to play!  It is a straight dice roll that refers to either the batter or pitcher.  The overwhelming majority of tabletop baseball board game fans want to be able to crank out a good number of games played in a relatively short period of time.  With SI, I typically was able to get 3 to 4 games played within an hour.  A perfect pace for making some good progress towards a slate of games and if one created standings, say National League and American League teams (8 each), then some movement in the standings too would be had in that time.  Baseball Classics was designed from the ground up with player results that could garnered quickly.  Over the years we updated our formulas and player cards to ensure very high accuracy.

SI player results consisted of lefty and righty for the batters, all within an easy view for comparison to see if you should bench or play someone based on the pitcher they are opposing.  Though the game didn’t account the same for pitcher’s lefty vs. righty results, it was still good enough.  I considered this righty and lefty results for player cards in Baseball Classics, though after researching it decided it was not a wise idea.  Here’s why:

  1. Frankly, though for some players there were some clear differentiation when they faced a lefty or righty, the overwhelming majority of the players didn’t have that much of a difference to split their results out.
  2. Our player card design is our marquee; it would have been too disruptive towards the look and feel, hence potentially sacrificing game play ease and speed.
  3. Statistics for lefty vs. righty are not easy to get, especially far back and for pitchers; this matters a lot when offering any MLB team or season from 1901 to present.
  4. Statistics for players are typically listed as the sum of their results and widely discussed that way.  For example, when was the last time you heard or had a conversation with someone when speaking of Hank Aaron’s career home run total in terms of how many were hit off lefty vs. righty?  Instead most everyone simply states 755 homers.
  5. Since most all stats are the sum of a player’s performance, it already represents their lefty vs. righty total, so assuming a batter faced the same pitcher the same number of plate appearances, the results should be within an acceptable margin.

I respect the baseball purest that would still only want to play a tabletop baseball board game that offers lefty vs. righty game play ratings.  However I stand behind the level of high accuracy and fast, easy playability being a fundamental combination requirement not to be sacrificed.

The play charts in SI are easy to read, thus simple to follow and keep the game flow going.  They embraced the same great color-coding consistency that really made it smooth to play.  SI used the same dice for at bat results as play results such as base stealing and then referring to the chart was only necessary when a play beyond the at bat occurred.  This really keeps the pace of game play on track and yet still embraces the drama of play.  Baseball Classics incorporates the same theme throughout to seamlessly move from player card results look and feel to looking up play results in a simple to read condensed chart sporting the same look.  Keeping it simple, yet effective, that’s our policy and I tip my baseball hat to games like SI that deliver on this.

[divider top=”1″]

In conclusion, I would be so appreciative to hear from those who have played Sports Illustrated All-Time All-Star Baseball sharing your favorite memories, what you love about it, and/or any inspiration from it you would care to share in the comments.  I always brought mine with me on our family summer vacations throughout the USA, so it was well traveled and made the car trips go by fast and inspired a new game the next decade named Baseball Classics for all to play and enjoy.